{"id":100216,"date":"2022-10-18T09:28:45","date_gmt":"2022-10-18T13:28:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/?p=100216"},"modified":"2022-10-18T09:42:04","modified_gmt":"2022-10-18T13:42:04","slug":"companies-oppose-fema-clean-energy-structural-code-changes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/2022\/10\/companies-oppose-fema-clean-energy-structural-code-changes\/","title":{"rendered":"300 companies oppose FEMA clean energy structural code changes"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Three-hundred and eighteen clean energy companies are calling on International Code Council (ICC) voters to <a href=\"https:\/\/seia.org\/sites\/default\/files\/2022-10\/Clean%20Energy%20Industry%20ICC%20S76-22%20Opposition%20Letter%20October%202022%20embargoed.pdf\">reject a code proposal<\/a> from FEMA that could cause a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/2022\/10\/fema-proposes-change-to-building-code-that-could-increase-cost-of-ground-mounted-solar\/\">spike in cost for U.S. clean energy projects<\/a>, and instead proposed a set of compromise solutions.<\/p>\n<p>The proposed FEMA change to the 2024 International Building Code, S76-22, would require solar, storage and wind projects to meet risk category IV requirements, the most stringent category possible, that includes facilities like public utilities and power-generating stations.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe stated goal of FEMA\u2019s proposal is increased grid reliability, but when you needlessly make it harder to build resilient clean energy, the obvious effect is a reduction in reliability,\u201d said Abigail Ross Hopper, president and CEO of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.seia.org\/\">SEIA<\/a>. \u201cThis overreach is being made in an opaque process without input from experts on economic impacts, electric reliability and climate change. America\u2019s solar and storage industry is urging International Code Council voters to consider the real-world impact of this code and approve SEIA\u2019s compromise proposals.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>FEMA officials themselves confirmed they support the proposals put forward by SEIA and supported by the Distributed Wind Energy Association, according to oral testimony on Sept. 15 and a voter\u2019s guide that FEMA mailed out to voters on Oct. 13.<\/p>\n<p>This compromise framework (S79-22 and S81-22) includes a carve-out for solar projects to be designated as Risk Category 2. It includes a slight increase in structural requirements for solar facilities without leaping in cost by 30 to 40%, according to an estimate by Roth Capital Partners.<\/p>\n<p>By contrast, the FEMA proposal will require clean energy projects, which are critical to fighting climate change, to be built to withstand damaging natural disasters far beyond what is needed, SEIA stated in a press release. The organization expects that the switch to category IV will result in dozens of gigawatts of canceled clean energy projects.<\/p>\n<p>The voting period for ICC members runs from Oct. 17 through Nov. 1.<\/p>\n<p><em>News item from SEIA<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Three-hundred and eighteen clean energy companies are calling on International Code Council (ICC) voters to reject a code proposal from FEMA that could cause a spike in cost for U.S. clean energy projects, and instead proposed a set of compromise solutions. The proposed FEMA change to the 2024 International Building Code, S76-22, would require solar,&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":19854,"featured_media":92928,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":""},"categories":[3010,16,7,2650,1690],"tags":[199],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v20.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>300 companies oppose FEMA clean energy structural code changes<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Three-hundred and eighteen clean energy companies are calling on International Code Council (ICC) voters to reject a code proposal from FEMA that could\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/2022\/10\/companies-oppose-fema-clean-energy-structural-code-changes\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"300 companies oppose FEMA clean energy structural code changes\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Three-hundred and eighteen clean energy companies are calling on International Code Council (ICC) voters to reject a code proposal from FEMA that could\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/2022\/10\/companies-oppose-fema-clean-energy-structural-code-changes\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Solar Power World\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"facebook.com\/solarpowerworld\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-10-18T13:28:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-10-18T13:42:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/solar-ground-mount-stock.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"770\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"500\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Billy Ludt\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@solarbillyl\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@SolarPowerWorld\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Billy Ludt\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/2022\/10\/companies-oppose-fema-clean-energy-structural-code-changes\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/2022\/10\/companies-oppose-fema-clean-energy-structural-code-changes\/\",\"name\":\"300 companies oppose FEMA clean energy structural code changes\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-10-18T13:28:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-10-18T13:42:04+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/#\/schema\/person\/3f87570bf035fc7234e9f659418d53d0\"},\"description\":\"Three-hundred and eighteen clean energy companies are calling on International Code Council (ICC) voters to reject a code proposal from FEMA that could\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/2022\/10\/companies-oppose-fema-clean-energy-structural-code-changes\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/2022\/10\/companies-oppose-fema-clean-energy-structural-code-changes\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/2022\/10\/companies-oppose-fema-clean-energy-structural-code-changes\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"300 companies oppose FEMA clean energy structural code changes\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/\",\"name\":\"Solar Power World\",\"description\":\"Covering the world of solar power technology, development and installation.\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/#\/schema\/person\/3f87570bf035fc7234e9f659418d53d0\",\"name\":\"Billy Ludt\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4f524c746ec75d233119a709912bb122?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4f524c746ec75d233119a709912bb122?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Billy Ludt\"},\"description\":\"Billy Ludt is senior editor of Solar Power World and currently covers topics on mounting, installation and business issues.\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/solarpowerworldonline.com\",\"facebook.com\/solarpowerworld\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/solarpowerworld\/\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/solarbillyl\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/author\/bludt\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"300 companies oppose FEMA clean energy structural code changes","description":"Three-hundred and eighteen clean energy companies are calling on International Code Council (ICC) voters to reject a code proposal from FEMA that could","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/2022\/10\/companies-oppose-fema-clean-energy-structural-code-changes\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"300 companies oppose FEMA clean energy structural code changes","og_description":"Three-hundred and eighteen clean energy companies are calling on International Code Council (ICC) voters to reject a code proposal from FEMA that could","og_url":"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/2022\/10\/companies-oppose-fema-clean-energy-structural-code-changes\/","og_site_name":"Solar Power World","article_author":"facebook.com\/solarpowerworld","article_published_time":"2022-10-18T13:28:45+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-10-18T13:42:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":770,"height":500,"url":"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/solar-ground-mount-stock.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Billy Ludt","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@solarbillyl","twitter_site":"@SolarPowerWorld","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Billy Ludt","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/2022\/10\/companies-oppose-fema-clean-energy-structural-code-changes\/","url":"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/2022\/10\/companies-oppose-fema-clean-energy-structural-code-changes\/","name":"300 companies oppose FEMA clean energy structural code changes","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2022-10-18T13:28:45+00:00","dateModified":"2022-10-18T13:42:04+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/#\/schema\/person\/3f87570bf035fc7234e9f659418d53d0"},"description":"Three-hundred and eighteen clean energy companies are calling on International Code Council (ICC) voters to reject a code proposal from FEMA that could","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/2022\/10\/companies-oppose-fema-clean-energy-structural-code-changes\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/2022\/10\/companies-oppose-fema-clean-energy-structural-code-changes\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/2022\/10\/companies-oppose-fema-clean-energy-structural-code-changes\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"300 companies oppose FEMA clean energy structural code changes"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/","name":"Solar Power World","description":"Covering the world of solar power technology, development and installation.","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/#\/schema\/person\/3f87570bf035fc7234e9f659418d53d0","name":"Billy Ludt","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4f524c746ec75d233119a709912bb122?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4f524c746ec75d233119a709912bb122?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Billy Ludt"},"description":"Billy Ludt is senior editor of Solar Power World and currently covers topics on mounting, installation and business issues.","sameAs":["http:\/\/solarpowerworldonline.com","facebook.com\/solarpowerworld","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/solarpowerworld\/","https:\/\/twitter.com\/solarbillyl"],"url":"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/author\/bludt\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100216"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/19854"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=100216"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100216\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/92928"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=100216"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=100216"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.solarpowerworldonline.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=100216"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}